By: John Keitel FUNDAMENTAL
Everyone should understand after listening to this interview that Barack Obama, Democratic Presidential Nominee, is nothing but a Socialist.
Obama, “If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court. I think where it succeded was to vest formal rights in previously disposed peoples. So that I would now have the right to vote, I would now be able to sit a a lunch counter and as long as I could pay for it, it would be OK. But the Supreme Court NEVER VENTURED INTO THE ISSUES OF REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH AND MORE BASIC ISSUES OF POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE IN THIS SOCIETY.”
“And to that extent as radical as I think people try to radicalize the Warren Court it wasn’t that radical it didn’t BREAK FREE FROM THE ESSENTIAL CONSTRAINTS BY THE FOUNDING FATHERS IN THE CONSTITUTION, at least as its been interpreted and the Warren Court interpreted it in the same way that generally the CONSTITUTION IS A CHARTER OF NEGATIVE LIBERTIES SAYS WHAT THE STATE CAN’T DO TO YOU. WHAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CAN’T DO TO YOU. BUT DOESN’T SAY WHAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OR STATE GOVERNMENT MUST DO ON YOUR BEHALF.“
“
The following clip is a radio interview about how to obtain “redistribution of wealth” Not whether it is right or wrong.
Remember the Obama plan has been that rich are making $150,000. Yes, Obama has said $250,00, he has also said $200,000, and $150,000 (Joe Biden repeated this $150,000 number yesterday in Scranton, PA video below). So what is rich? Whatever number they come up with is rich!
This is a Marixist talking about how to change our Constitution.
]
Joe Biden says that rich is now $150,000.
Filed under: 1 | Tagged: 2001, barack, barry, bias, biased, communism, constitution, democrat, democratic, democrats, flawed, florida, hussein, interview, marxisim, media, obama, political, politics, radio, redistribution, socialism, socialist, Video, youtube
Ho hum. You do know that inflammatory words like socialist and marxist don’t automatically bring up the bogyman fears like they used to, especially with younger folks. Only angry old white men get their hanes in a twist anymore. Right wing ideology that is fear based and fear mongering is outdated and proven not to work in the real world. I’d suggest that you try and make your arguments a bit more rationally so you don’t sound so freaking crazy.
The words have meaning. Just because you and “younger People” drank the marxist kool-aide during your education doesn’t mean that the words are deluded. Your thoughts have been deluded.
I had a liberal education and I am pursuing higher education now. I have text books that promote anti-capitalism and even quote Karl Marx. I make my own decisions and choose capitalism.
Tell me how this isn’t Marxist.
hmm, spread the wealth vs concentrate the wealth…you decide…
Personally I think money is more like water than anything else, collect all of it in one place and it stagnates and can be deadly, when it flows and it spread among the fields, it makes the crops grow.
o.k. umm..I just read that quote…and it doesn’t say anything near to what you want it to say.
That’s a Constitutional Law professor talking about the question of the degree of radical-ness of the Warren Court.
He’s saying that it wasn’t that radical, and in fact, stuck to talking about the same thing that makes the Constitution so special, in that it doesn’t say what rights citizens have, but instead talks about the rights the government DOESN’T have.
Obama is well aware of the limits of the law, and your fear that he wants to expand and break them are completely unfounded. He has dedicated his life to studying that law, and it is that law that is responsible for the possibility that his life has become.
He has dedicated his life to find ways to change the Constitution to fit his ideals and mold our constitution into something like marxism.
Redistributing wealth does not work it stifles productivity. It was tried in Jamestown and failed. They went to private property and the settlement flourished.
Be careful believing what a trained debater says with smooth words. Be even more careful when he says he wants to change the Constitution that has served us very well for more than 200 years. More than any other Government in the worlds history!
Be careful believing what an undereducated right-wing dittohead says with clunky words.
Be even more careful when he makes what he thinks are historical claims!
You don’t have to listen to my words. The words from the Great Obama himself tell you what you need to know.
or maybe you need it defined.
so⋅cial⋅ism
–noun
1. a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and CONTROL of the means of production and DISTRIBUTION, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.
2. procedure or practice in accordance with this theory.
3. (in MARXIST theory) THE STAGE FOLLOWING CAPITALISM IN THE TRANSITION OF A SOCIETY TO COMMUNISM, characterized by the imperfect implementation of collectivist principles.
This sourced from the liberal dictionary; http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/socialism
[...] and Moore would much prefer disregard and ultimately see destroyed. Their pal Obama has long spoken openly regarding his belief that the US Constitution is fundamentally flawed. The agenda of this crowd is [...]
I’m only eighteen (could not vote at the time of elections) and I believe everything you say. Obama is not ruling America with American values, he belongs in Europe where socialism is allowed to grow, but, then again, even they see through him. Americans have just become so lazy and would take any way out except now they’ve come into contact with potential redistribution like mentioned in the article. I can only hope that people accept responsibility rather than permanent mediocrity…